Are sound abatement measures necessary in the cytology reading room? A study of auditory distraction.
Identifieur interne : 000883 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000882; suivant : 000884Are sound abatement measures necessary in the cytology reading room? A study of auditory distraction.
Auteurs : A. Evered [Royaume-Uni] ; A. Watt [Royaume-Uni] ; N. Perham [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology [ 1365-2303 ] ; 2018.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- effets indésirables : Stimulation acoustique.
- méthodes : Cytodiagnostic.
- physiologie : Attention, Temps de réaction.
- Adolescent, Adulte, Femelle, Humains, Jeune adulte, Mâle, Personnel de laboratoire d'analyses médicales.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Acoustic Stimulation.
- methods : Cytodiagnosis.
- physiology : Attention, Reaction Time.
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Laboratory Personnel, Young Adult.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Listening to music and other auditory material during microscopy work is common practice among cytologists. While many cytologists would claim several benefits of such activity, research in other fields suggests that it might adversely affect diagnostic performance. Using a cross-modal distraction paradigm, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of auditory stimulation on the visual interpretation of cell images.
METHODS
Following initial training, 34 participants undertook cell interpretation tests under four auditory conditions (liked music, disliked music, speech and silence) in a counterbalanced repeated-measures study. Error rate, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, criterion and response time were measured for each condition.
RESULTS
There was no significant effect of auditory stimulation on the accuracy or speed with which cell images were interpreted, mirroring the results of a previous visual distraction study.
CONCLUSION
To the extent that the experiment reflects clinical practice, listening to music or other forms of auditory material whilst undertaking microscopy duties is unlikely to be a source of distraction in the cytopathology reading room. From a cognitive perspective, the results are consistent with the notion that high focal-task engagement may have blocked any attentional capture the sound may otherwise have produced.
DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12457
PubMed: 28884486
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Are sound abatement measures necessary in the cytology reading room? A study of auditory distraction.</title><author><name sortKey="Evered, A" sort="Evered, A" uniqKey="Evered A" first="A" last="Evered">A. Evered</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Cytology Department, Cervical Screening Wales Laboratory, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Cytology Department, Cervical Screening Wales Laboratory, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Watt, A" sort="Watt, A" uniqKey="Watt A" first="A" last="Watt">A. Watt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Perham, N" sort="Perham, N" uniqKey="Perham N" first="N" last="Perham">N. Perham</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2018">2018</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28884486</idno><idno type="pmid">28884486</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/cyt.12457</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000931</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000931</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000931</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000931</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000931</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Are sound abatement measures necessary in the cytology reading room? A study of auditory distraction.</title><author><name sortKey="Evered, A" sort="Evered, A" uniqKey="Evered A" first="A" last="Evered">A. Evered</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Cytology Department, Cervical Screening Wales Laboratory, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Cytology Department, Cervical Screening Wales Laboratory, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Watt, A" sort="Watt, A" uniqKey="Watt A" first="A" last="Watt">A. Watt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Perham, N" sort="Perham, N" uniqKey="Perham N" first="N" last="Perham">N. Perham</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cardiff</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology</title><idno type="eISSN">1365-2303</idno><imprint><date when="2018" type="published">2018</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation (adverse effects)</term><term>Adolescent (MeSH)</term><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Attention (physiology)</term><term>Cytodiagnosis (methods)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Medical Laboratory Personnel (MeSH)</term><term>Reaction Time (physiology)</term><term>Young Adult (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Attention (physiologie)</term><term>Cytodiagnostic (méthodes)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Jeune adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Personnel de laboratoire d'analyses médicales (MeSH)</term><term>Stimulation acoustique (effets indésirables)</term><term>Temps de réaction (physiologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Stimulation acoustique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Cytodiagnosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Cytodiagnostic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Attention</term><term>Temps de réaction</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Attention</term><term>Reaction Time</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Medical Laboratory Personnel</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Personnel de laboratoire d'analyses médicales</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b></p><p>Listening to music and other auditory material during microscopy work is common practice among cytologists. While many cytologists would claim several benefits of such activity, research in other fields suggests that it might adversely affect diagnostic performance. Using a cross-modal distraction paradigm, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of auditory stimulation on the visual interpretation of cell images.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Following initial training, 34 participants undertook cell interpretation tests under four auditory conditions (liked music, disliked music, speech and silence) in a counterbalanced repeated-measures study. Error rate, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, criterion and response time were measured for each condition.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>There was no significant effect of auditory stimulation on the accuracy or speed with which cell images were interpreted, mirroring the results of a previous visual distraction study.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>To the extent that the experiment reflects clinical practice, listening to music or other forms of auditory material whilst undertaking microscopy duties is unlikely to be a source of distraction in the cytopathology reading room. From a cognitive perspective, the results are consistent with the notion that high focal-task engagement may have blocked any attentional capture the sound may otherwise have produced.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28884486</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>11</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1365-2303</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>29</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2018</Year><Month>02</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Cytopathology</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Are sound abatement measures necessary in the cytology reading room? A study of auditory distraction.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>84-89</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/cyt.12457</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE">Listening to music and other auditory material during microscopy work is common practice among cytologists. While many cytologists would claim several benefits of such activity, research in other fields suggests that it might adversely affect diagnostic performance. Using a cross-modal distraction paradigm, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of auditory stimulation on the visual interpretation of cell images.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS">Following initial training, 34 participants undertook cell interpretation tests under four auditory conditions (liked music, disliked music, speech and silence) in a counterbalanced repeated-measures study. Error rate, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, criterion and response time were measured for each condition.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS">There was no significant effect of auditory stimulation on the accuracy or speed with which cell images were interpreted, mirroring the results of a previous visual distraction study.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION">To the extent that the experiment reflects clinical practice, listening to music or other forms of auditory material whilst undertaking microscopy duties is unlikely to be a source of distraction in the cytopathology reading room. From a cognitive perspective, the results are consistent with the notion that high focal-task engagement may have blocked any attentional capture the sound may otherwise have produced.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Evered</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8918-6440</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Cytology Department, Cervical Screening Wales Laboratory, Cardiff, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Watt</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Perham</LastName><ForeName>N</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2017</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>07</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Cytopathology</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9010345</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0956-5507</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000161" MajorTopicYN="N">Acoustic Stimulation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001288" MajorTopicYN="N">Attention</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003581" MajorTopicYN="N">Cytodiagnosis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017056" MajorTopicYN="Y">Medical Laboratory Personnel</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011930" MajorTopicYN="N">Reaction Time</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">auditory distraction</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">cognition</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">cytology</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">perception</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2017</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28884486</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/cyt.12457</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Evered, A" sort="Evered, A" uniqKey="Evered A" first="A" last="Evered">A. Evered</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Evered, A" sort="Evered, A" uniqKey="Evered A" first="A" last="Evered">A. Evered</name><name sortKey="Perham, N" sort="Perham, N" uniqKey="Perham N" first="N" last="Perham">N. Perham</name><name sortKey="Watt, A" sort="Watt, A" uniqKey="Watt A" first="A" last="Watt">A. Watt</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000883 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000883 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteMusiqueV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28884486
|texte= Are sound abatement measures necessary in the cytology reading room? A study of auditory distraction.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28884486" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |